The Supreme Court Bench comprising CJI. Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud and Justice Hima Kohli were hearing miscellaneous appeals challenging the RBI Directions 2016. The Supreme Court bench observed that the principles of natural justice, particularly the rule of 'audi alteram partem', have to be necessarily read into the Master Directions on Frauds to save it from the vice of arbitrariness. Since the classification of an account as fraud entails serious civil consequences for the borrower, the directions must be construed reasonably by reading into them the requirement of observing the principles of natural justice.
The civil appeals arise out of a challenge to the Reserve Bank of India (Frauds Classification and Reporting by Commercial Banks and Select FIs) Directions 2016. Issued by the Reserve Bank of India, these directions were challenged before different High Courts primarily on the ground that no opportunity of being heard is envisaged by borrowers before classifying their accounts as fraudulent. The High Court of Telangana has held in the impugned judgment that the principles of natural justice must be read into the provisions of the Master Directions on Frauds. The decision has been assailed by the RBI and lender banks through these civil appeals. In this background, the Supreme Court has to consider whether the principles of natural justice should be read into the provisions of the Master Directions on Frauds.
In the realm of banking law, a crucial principle is known as 'audi alteram partem', or "hear the other side," holds immense significance. It embodies the principle of natural justice, ensuring that individuals affected by a decision have the right to present their case before any adverse action is taken against them. One such situation arises when borrowers' accounts are classified as fraudulent by banks or financial institutions.
The decision to label an account as fraudulent is a severe one, as it can have far-reaching consequences for the borrower. In order to uphold fairness and transparency, it is imperative that this decision be made through a reasoned order, taking into account all relevant factors and providing an opportunity for the borrower to present their side of the story.
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), as the central banking authority in India, issues guidelines and regulations to govern the banking sector. These regulations, known as Master Directions, lay down the framework within which banks operate. In the context of account classification as fraud, the RBI's Master Directions do not explicitly provide for an opportunity of hearing to the borrower.
However, in order to safeguard against the potential pitfalls of arbitrariness, it is essential to read 'audi alteram partem' into the provisions of the Master Directions. By doing so, the rights of borrowers are protected, ensuring that they have the opportunity to be heard and present their defence before their accounts are classified as fraudulent.
The principle of natural justice demands that the borrowers be served a notice when their account is being scrutinized for potential fraud. This notice should detail the allegations against them and provide them with a reasonable opportunity to respond. Additionally, borrowers should be granted the chance to explain any conclusions drawn from a forensic audit report that may have contributed to the suspicion of fraud.
To ensure a fair process, borrowers should also be given the opportunity to represent themselves or be represented by their banks or Joint Lender's Forum (JLF) before any final decision is made. This allows for a balanced and comprehensive assessment of the situation, taking into account the borrower's perspective and any mitigating factors that may have contributed to the account's classification as fraudulent.
While the Master Directions on Frauds do not expressly include the 'audi alteram partem' principle, the overarching principles of natural justice necessitate its application in this context. Excluding this fundamental principle would undermine the fairness and legitimacy of the decision-making process, potentially leading to arbitrary account classifications and detrimental consequences for borrowers.
The Supreme Court noted that the principles of natural justice, particularly the rule of 'audi alteram partem', have to be necessarily read into the Master Directions on Frauds to save it from the vice of arbitrariness. Since the classification of an account as fraud entails serious civil consequences for the borrower, the directions must be construed reasonably by reading into them the requirement of observing the principles of natural justice.
The Supreme Court upheld the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Telangana dated 10 December 2020 and set aside the judgments of the High Court of Telangana dated 22 December 2021 and 31 December 2021 and of the High Court of Gujarat dated 23 December 2021.
In conclusion, the right of borrowers to be heard before their accounts are classified as fraud is a crucial aspect of banking law. It ensures fairness, transparency, and the application of natural justice principles. The RBI's Master Directions should incorporate provisions explicitly granting borrowers the opportunity to be heard, serve notices, explain forensic audit conclusions, and be represented by banks or JLF. By upholding the principle of 'audi alteram partem', the banking system can maintain its integrity while safeguarding the rights and interests of borrowers.
留言